Wednesday, December 26, 2007
The NY Times gets into the act of the mainsmear media, ignoring policies and issues
read more | digg story
USA Today: "Electability"
USA Today attempts to move John Edwards out of the Iowa primary race by excluding him from their reporting about "electability."
The paper forgot to mention that Edwards outperforms both Clinton and Obama in hypothetical head-to-head contests against Republican rivals.
In fact, the only mention of Edwards at all comes in pigeon-holing him at 15 percentage point backing by voters in a USA Today/Gallup poll.
Here is FAIR's reporting on the matter.
Thursday, December 20, 2007
Free Press Applauds House Media Ownership Act
read more | digg story
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
Story of the Day: NY Times Buries Dodd's Filibuster Victory
read more | digg story
Friday, December 14, 2007
Saturday, December 8, 2007
Friday, December 7, 2007
Bush Goes Private to Spy on You
read more | digg story
No Comment
read more | digg story
Wednesday, December 5, 2007
Information Warfare
One suspect thought to be involved in "terrorist media and propaganda operations" was detained in Baghdad, along with a "large amount" of propaganda materials, the military said.
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
CASH STARVED FOREST SERVICE SPENDS $600,000 TO BUY TASERS
The Forest Service has anted-up to the weapons racketeers in the Homeland Security syndicate.
read more
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Pentagon Chief Calls for Nonmilitary Help
For starters, he said, Washington does a lousy job of spinning the news abroad.
“Public relations was invented in the United States, yet we are miserable at communicating to the rest of the world what we are about,” he said. “It is just embarrassing that al-Qaida is better at disseminating its message on the Internet than America.”
Gates begins to echo the Rumsfeld meme of propaganda, media war, and information control.
Gates spoke at Kansas State University yesterday, in the Landon lecture series. He tried to blame the failures of the US's foreign policy on the State Department and other "civilian" outfits.
Isn't it interesting that there's a CIA guy running DoD and a DoD guy running CIA?
read more | digg story
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Counting on Chaos at the Polls
read more | digg story
Monday, November 19, 2007
Fascist America in Ten Easy Steps
read more | digg story
Sunday, November 18, 2007
Dick Cheney's Sadistic Passion for Shooting Tame Animals
read more | digg story
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
18 arrested in antiwar protest by veterans - The Boston Globe
read more | digg story
BREAKING: Sky -- Probably Not Falling
None of the studio chiefs would talk on the record, but if I were to sum up their views, I’d put it this way: The future is too uncertain for us to give anything away.
This is simply another blatant example of the economic and social distortions that the corporate media themselves have engendered over the last 30 years in our society. They promulgate the misconception that owners' and managers' proprietary interest in commercial enterprises is somehow greater than or superior to the interest of workers.
Now these media "aristocrats" are using this same misconception they have disseminated as a tool for cutting out the interests of society and workers from the commercial enterprise they have been entrusted with.
This is bald theft, not only of the benefits and sustenance -- money -- the writers are entitled to by virtue of their participation in the media enterprises, but it is an attempt to steal the very idea of democratic participation from the business sector of our society. So the assault on democracy continues, abetted by corporate media in broadcasting and in their own management policies.
Isn't it time We, The People, the sovereigns in our system, called upon our "representatives" to intervene on behalf of our democratic rights and principles, and for the workers?
Whenever a new technology has arrived, Hollywood has seen it as a grave threat to prosperity, whether it was the coming of talkies, the growth of television or the arrival of the VCR, the greatest gravy train of all, which the studios immediately attempted to sue out of existence.
read more | digg story
Friday, November 9, 2007
The Huey Longs of Iowa
read more | digg story
Thursday, November 8, 2007
Uncle Sam on the Line (You have got to be kidding me.)
PUNCH LINE: Don’t sue phone companies for letting the government listen in.
read more | digg story
Wednesday, November 7, 2007
DOJ pressures NYSBOE
Mr. Peter S. Kosinski
Stanley L. Zalen
Co-Executive Directors
New York State Board of Elections
40 Steuben Street
Albany, NY 12207-2108
November 7, 2006
Re: Civil Action No. 06-CV-0263 (GLS)
Dear Sirs:
It is unfair for the US Department of Justice to place all the responsibility for the unmet certification deadlines on the NYS Board of Elections.
The Department of Justice has not established reasonable standards for certification of HAVA compliant voting systems, and this has created great difficulty on the part of New York State to find vendors whose equipment meets NYS standards.
The Federal government has not required vendors to escrow with any State any proprietary source code for the voting equipment in question. In light of the numerous demonstrated fallibilities of proprietary vendor source codes in voting systems around the country, it is unreasonable for the Department of Justice to require New York State to waive this prohibition against secret and private source codes in public voting systems.
The Department of Justice has not objectively evaluated New York State's standards in NYS Election Law Section 7-200. It is unreasonable for the State of New York to purchase voting systems which haven’t been tested according to the requirements of State law. According to Northeast Citizens for Responsible Media, a grass roots New York State, non-partisan activist group:
New York's Procurement Laws prohibit NYS from entering into contracts with "non-responsible" vendors. New York's courts have upheld findings of vendor non-responsibility for the very ethical violations these vendors have committed as well as barring the state from doing business with vendors with criminal indictments, criminal convictions, and of course records of failed past performance. The voting vendors are guilty of multiple infractions of all these criteria.
Press Release, Northeast Citizens For Responsible Media, http://www.re-media.org/, November 7, 2007
The Department of Justice is not supporting New York State in our efforts to procure a reliable and secure voting system for our elections. Rather, the US Department of Justice is seeking to bully New York State into buying expensive and unreliable equipment from private vendors who refuse to comply with New York State’s voter protection laws.
Please do not submit to the unreasonable demands of the Department of Justice. Their arguments demonstrably do not stand in the best interests of the voters of New York State or the United States. Rather, they are trying to bully New York State into privatizing our election system by giving private vendors proprietary control of the voting system. That is unacceptable and the Department of Justice must drop its suit and support New York State in our efforts to improve our voting system.
Sincerely,
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
Bush exhorts Musharraf to hold elections and relinquish army post - The Bos
read more | digg story
Monday, November 5, 2007
U.S. economy grows at 3.9% pace in third quarter
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- The U.S. economy shook off the worst housing downturn in a generation to grow at a 3.9% annual pace in third quarter, the best performance in six quarters, the Commerce Department estimated Wednesday.
It's not tongue-in-cheek, either. Skeptical? I know I am.
Read More
Friday, November 2, 2007
Nacchio affects spy probe
read more | digg story
Dogs Tired of Being Shot on "Accident": Dog shoots Iowa man during hunt
read more | digg story
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Bush has new plan to avoid Congress
read more | digg story
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Where Does the Right-Wing End and the Media Begin?
read more | digg story
Monday, October 29, 2007
FCC Set To End Sole Cable Deals For Apartments
Fearing Fear Itself
read more | digg story
Saturday, October 27, 2007
Thursday, October 25, 2007
FCC Hearing Shuts Out the Public
read more | digg story
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Notes on FISA and PAA revisions
Honorable Senator Rockefeller:
Please represent my views in support of one law, equally applied to all parties, under which all parties--citizens and corporations--are justly held accountable.
This particularly pertains to secret government programs to "monitor terrorists" by spying, eavesdropping and culling the phone records of law abiding citizens.
I refuse to let terrorists declare victory over our Constitutional rights.
In fact, our rights are enshrined in the Constitution, not because our government has any proprietary authority over who benefits from them and to what extent they are bestowed upon citizens, aliens and foreigners. No, on the contrary, the Second and Fourth Amendments and the limitations on the Article II powers are enshrined in the Constitution because they represent "universal truths" that are "self-evident" as the Declaration of Independence so plainly states.
These rights and the equality of their legal application pertain to "all men [people]." (They do not contain to fictional constructions such as corporations.)
The government's sole responsibility is to protect, safeguard and extend our citizens' rights, from rogue politicians, economic entitities or foreign and domestic enemies. Terrorists are any foreign and domestic entity that use terror for political gain.
What would constitute political gain for terrorists? How about frightening our "leaders" into attempting to curtail our God-given, Constitutionally codified rights and liberties.
Uphold the law, the Constitution and its principles. Do not give in to terror as some cowardly "leaders" insist we must do to "be safe."
The "soft on terror" are those who would capitulate by cowering from the front lines in defense of liberty and freedom and finding excuses like "economic necessity" or "national security" for placing restrictions and inequalities on universal, guaranteed American citizens' rights and liberties.
Sincerely,
Capitaine Dunquerque
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Great Pacific Garbage Patch
read more | digg story
Is a Presidential Coup Under Way?
read more | digg story
When America Went Fascist -- Happy Halloween!
read more | digg story
Fascist America, in 10 easy steps!
read more | digg story
Telecom Companies Seeking Wiretap Immunity Donate to Senator
read more | digg story
Sunday, October 21, 2007
Confront the War President
I wonder how another Saturday march is going to be anything more than futile, but like Robert Jensen says, we need to meet with and support one another now more than ever.
Saturday, October 20, 2007
One Graph Says It All About The New Telecom Immunity Bill
by dday [@dKos]
Fri Oct 19, 2007 at 05:18:57 PM PDT
I want you to take a look at something.
The graph shows AT&T employee contributions to Senate Intelligence Committee chair Jay Rockefeller over the past several years. There weren't enough of them to fill out the graph until he got the chairman's gavel in early 2007. Then for some unexplained reason, the contributions skyrocketed. Same with Verizon.
Read more
Friday, October 19, 2007
Clinton Bucks The Trend and Rakes in Cash From The US Weapons Industry
read more | digg story
And, aside from the weapons lobby, this is an interesting group, too.
Thursday, October 18, 2007
Priests Protesting Torture at Fort Huachuca Jailed for Justice
read more | digg story
'The Moment Has Come to Get Rid of Saddam'
There is a difference between being sure and being right.
-- Mark Danner, NY Review of Books"align">
Read More
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
Democrats put off vote on eavesdrop bill
On a day of sharp debate over the bill, Republicans accused Democrats of giving U.S. constitutional rights to suspected terrorists and Bush said the legislation would be a setback in the fight against terrorism.
The Washington Post reports that
"There is absolutely no reason our intelligence officials should have to consult government lawyers before listening in to terrorist communications with the likes of Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda and other foreign terror groups," said House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio).
The measure "extends our Constitution beyond American soil to our enemies who want to cut the heads off Americans," said Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.).
Monday, October 15, 2007
Gore Derangement Syndrome
Actually, the editorialist fails to distinguish between "the right wing" and the "right wing pundits and media." Hopefully there is a difference by now. In the collapse of the Bush administration, the right wing must contain some principled and reasoning Americans, splintered off from the mob in spite of the continuous propaganda of hatred and distortion that emanates from the corporate media and did so much to promote the Bush Administration and its failed policies.
So if science says that we have a big problem that can’t be solved with tax cuts or bombs — well, the science must be rejected, and the scientists must be slimed.
Aside from the fact that the mob from the church and the country club stood aside and cheered in 2000 when the corporate/military chiefs foisted BushCo onto the nation in spite of Gore's popular vote victory--in Florida, as well as in the nation as a whole--and BushCo has had a six year honeymoon with a pro-censorship, corporate controlled media that has slimed Gore at every opportunity--Gore continues to dwarf Bush in popularity, achievement, and world stature.
Friday, October 12, 2007
Thursday, October 11, 2007
Uncertainty Cuts Both Ways
Just when you thought we were all waking up from a nightmare, it turns out to be real.
chapter 1's diary at dKos.
Global Warming: Scientific Consensus Proved Wrong.
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Fixing FISA
Based on what is revealed about McConnel's role in outsourcing military contracts and his willingness to toss around threatening language to the Congress like e.f.p.s, you'd think there would be a little more muckraking in the mainstream media about him right now.
As Digby says,
It's pretty clear why McConnell is so hellbent on immunity for telcoms isn't it? This man is one of the architects of a new shadowy, privatized defense industry that's sprung up over the past few years, an industry that's paid for by you and me, but over which we don't have any say, either as individuals or through our representatives in congress. It makes Ike's military industrial complex look positively benign by comparison.
Congress Ignoring Critical Report on Pentagon Spending
The Congressional Research Service published a couple of reports this year on the runaway costs of the So-Called War On Terror.Congress seems to be ignoring the findings and related testimony by the Comptroller General of the GAO, David Walker.The facts suggest Pentagon accounting is inaccurate and wasteful, in urgent need of oversight.
read more | digg story
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
Democrats Seem Ready to Extend Wiretap Powers
read more | digg story
Monday, October 8, 2007
New revelations in attack on American spy ship [USS Liberty]
[Written by Pulitzer Prize winning journalist John Crewdson] "Veterans, documents suggest U.S., Israel didn't tell full story of deadly '67 incident"... That's an understatement. Veterans, documents PROVE Israeli misconduct and intentional attacking of the US craft. Again. This just piles onto previous evidence.
read more | digg story
Billie J. Kramer & The Dakotas in 1965
Maybe this will work.
Tuesday, October 2, 2007
How the Democrats blew it
The Iraq debacle handed Democrats a golden opportunity to deal the GOP a mortal blow and change America's flawed Mideast policies.
read more | digg story
Monday, October 1, 2007
Local Solutions: Challenge Corporate Power, Embrace True Democracy
So here you have globalization adding to emissions and it needs to be a continued part of our work. And you've got false solutions that were laid out by Jerry [Mander]. But the false solution that I think we need to pay particular attention to is the dominant solution in terms of carbon trading. Because at the philosophical level, at the world-view level, it's the second privatization of the atmospheric commons. The first privatization was putting the pollution into the atmosphere beyond the earth's recycling capacity. Now with carbon trading, the rights to the earth's carbon cycling capacity are gravitating exactly into the arms of the polluters. The environmental principal used to be the polluter must pay. Carbon trading is transforming that into the polluter gets paid.
She rightfully zeros in on carbon-trading and corporate-controlled governments as the enemies of our future generations in the battle for survival of life as we know it on our planet.
read more
U.S. Pays Steep Price for Private Security in Iraq
It costs the U.S. government a lot more to hire contract employees as security guards in Iraq than to use American troops.
read more | digg story
Sunday, September 30, 2007
Informed Comment: Crime of the Century
By refusing to allow Saddam to flee with guarantees, Bush ensured that a land war would have to be fought. This is one of the greatest crimes any US president ever committed, and it is all the more contemptible for being rooted in mere pride and petulance.
read more
The Shadow Army
The overarching goal of government is supposedly the adoption of policies and practices that promote the public good. For contractors performing government services, the bottom line is profit.
Prof. Janine Wedel is a member of the New America Foundation, who seem to be keeping hope alive for American civilians in the wake of the fascist military police state takeover bid--especially as far as scholarship, journalism and intelligence are concerned.
IF THERE is a quagmire in Iraq, it was created more than a decade ago when the United States instituted a flawed system governing the use of contractors to perform governmental functions.Now, despite Iraqi fury at Blackwater USA, accused of fatally shooting Iraqis, Washington is so reliant on the firm that it dare not order it from the field.
read more | digg story
Saturday, September 29, 2007
Will Blackwater Be Kicked Out of Iraq After Recent Bloodbath?
In Baghdad there is great determination to bring the perpetrators of the Nisour Square slaughter to justice. An investigative team made up of officials from Iraq's Interior, National Security and Defense ministries said in a preliminary report that "the murder of citizens in cold blood in the Nisour area by Blackwater is considered a terrorist action against civilians just like any other terrorist operation."
But Iraqi investigators claim that they have received little or no information from the US government and have been denied access to the Blackwater operatives involved in the shootings. A US official appeared to dismiss the validity of the Iraqi investigation, telling the New York Times, "There is only the joint investigation that we have with the Iraqis."
Are we supposed to believe what the Bush Administration and Blackwater spokespersons tell us about what happened on September 16 in Iraq? I don't think so. So how do we get the facts? So embedded is Blackwater in the US apparatus in Iraq that the incident in Nisour Square has sparked a crisis for the occupation.
read more | digg story
Friday, September 28, 2007
The Mega-Lie Called the "War on Terror"
But as citizens, it's our job to sort out this mess and work to restore our democracy and the health of our society.
read more
Runaway (Spending) Train
The tidal wave of red ink that has drowned our future generations since BushCo took over is largely due to war, munitions, and private security bills. The creation of the Federal Department of Homeland Security alone cost billions. That was just to set it up, before they even did anything.The strategy plainly is to drain the economy for imaginary security threats that trump social spending. This will force a cowering population led by privately-financed politicians to abandon social programs for destruction and force programs.The New York Times does a great job of delicately unmasking this shark lurking beneath our socio-economic surface: the fat violent predator who will gobble up our society in one ferocious fiscal attack.What the Times doesn't point out, however, is what is inevitably the endgame of this scenario. There isn't a country, an empire, a police state in history that hasn't followed the script of turning its imperial forces against its own population. Military-industrial presidents and congresspersons will ensure that after our population is stripped of effective political power, we will then be stripped of all socially progressive public programs.The war costs too much, you see, and the people have to pay for it even after they decide it isn't worth the costs. So the unitary executive uses his/her new powers and private armed forces to completely shut down political dissent, opposition, or social advocacy.It becomes a security issue, and security trumps everything.If Bob Herbert is able to keep writing editorials long enough to chronicle this American civil destruction, I doubt the "liberal" New York Times will still be able to publish by then anything as critical and suggestive as this editorial.
Behold Burma.
read more | digg story
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
'A Coup Has Occurred'
read more | digg story
State Dept. intercedes in Blackwater probe - Los Angeles Times
read more | digg story
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
Despite Improving U.S. Current Account Deficits, Risks of A Crisis Growing
American investors are sending their capital overseas in rapidly increasing quantities.
The only thing propping up the dollar thus far are mega purchases of US assets, including government bonds, by benevolent foreign governments.
The rapid growth of these outflows is consistent with scenarios suggesting that a financial crisis will result in a 'hard landing' for the U.S. economy. But for those purchases by foreign central banks and governments, the dollar might have collapsed already.
read more | digg story
War-Monger vs. The Porn King: Is Bill Kristol Respectable?
read more | digg story
The Still-Unreported Story of “Top Gun” George Bush
read more | digg story
From the Start, the Space Race Was an Arms Race
What would all those engineers, soldiers, secretaries and janitors do if the Pentagon ever closed?
They don't have to worry as long as our politicians sustain warfare/welfare as we know it.
Critics say the overall program is costly and unnecessary, and the funds better spent on countering such threats as terrorism.
Today, the biggest item in the nation’s arms budget is building antimissile weapons.
U.N. Chief Urges Fast Action on Global Climate Change
read more | digg story
Monday, September 24, 2007
U.S. Repeatedly Rebuffed Iraq on Blackwater Complaints
BAGHDAD, Sept. 22 -- Senior Iraqi officials repeatedly complained to U.S. officials about Blackwater USA's alleged involvement in the deaths of numerous Iraqis, but the Americans took little action to regulate the private security firm until 11 Iraqis were shot dead last Sunday, according to U.S....
read more | digg story
Bush to Skip U.N. Talks on Global Warming
read more | digg story
Thursday, September 20, 2007
China's Hot Stock: Orwell Inc.
America must disenthrall itself from one of its most cherished myths: that capitalism and democracy go hand in hand, that the spread of markets inevitably means the coming of democracy. That was a key argument that proponents of extending permanent favored trade status to China made during the 1990s. In fact, the creation of the Chinese-American economic entity that followed -- in effect, moving our manufacturing belt from the Midwest to Shenzhen -- has demonstrated the opposite. Leading American companies such as Microsoft, Google and Yahoo have acquiesced in Chinese Internet censorship. China's nonexistent standards of product safety -- the direct consequence of its absence of democracy -- became our standards, too.
read more | digg story
Oil and Betrayal in Iraq
read more | digg story
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
ABC News: Top U.S. Spy: FBI, CIA Failed to Stop 9/11
read more | digg story
Russia and China warn against war with Iran
read more | digg story
Tuesday, September 18, 2007
Bush setting America up for war with Iran
Just when you thought things were getting slow and boring, the British papers have the skinny.
In a chilling scenario of how war might come, a senior intelligence officer warned that public denunciation of Iranian meddling in Iraq - arming and training militants - would lead to cross border raids on Iranian training camps and bomb factories.
IAEA Chief Exhorts Iran's Critics to Avoid Threats of Force
read more | digg story
Bankrolling Iran
read more | digg story
Statement of President Machen at UF
read more | digg story
Prepare for war with Iran, says French minister
read more | digg story
Move troops to Iran border, Brown told
read more | digg story
U.S. rushes to smooth Iraq's anger over Blackwater - Los Angeles Times
read more | digg story
Monday, September 17, 2007
There are no Protesters Here
read more | digg story
Police Taser Florida Student After He Asks John Kerry Why No One Has Tried
read more | digg story
Iraq Death Toll Rivals Rwanda Genocide, Cambodian Killing Fields
read more | digg story
Blackwater license being pulled in Iraq
read more | digg story
US State Department motorcade attacked in Baghdad - The Boston Globe
read more | digg story
Saturday, September 15, 2007
The Shock Doctrine Short Film
read more | digg story
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
Broadcasting Lobbyists Try to Squash Affordable Internet Access
read more | digg story
Move On
Despite a volley of contradictory reports, the military's chief spokesperson testifies this week that we must "stay the course" and unequivocally support elevated troop levels in the occupation of Iraq until next summer.
The American people heard these kinds of arguments before. The Administration has no credibility when it comes to providing statistics and intelligence on conditions in Iraq, or elsewhere.
Petraeus has plainly compiled data selectively, just as the Office of Special Plans did in 2002, to make the Administration's case for protracted expenditures for the occupation.
The only progress the General has been able to hold up for scrutiny is in Anbar province, where the reduction in sectarian killings and attacks on coalition personnel have not been attributed by anyone to the surge in American forces. Elsewhere, sectarian killings have either continued as before, escalated, or created such devastation and refugee crises as to depopulate the areas where the killings were taking place before, thus causing a statistical downturn.
Finally, Petraeus is the same general who wrote a Wall Street "Journal" op-ed before the 2004 election saying that things were really improving in Iraq and we were about to turn the corner.
Neither Petraeus nor the other Administration leaders have any credibility on Iraq or other foreign policy matters. Neither Congress nor the American people should place the least credence in these hearings with General Petraeus, Mr. Crocker, and others.
What was to have been a short and inexepensive mission of regime change in a would-be prosperous country, has turned into an interminable, violent occupation, unimaginably expensive to the American people that has devastated Iraq, seemingly irreparably.
Are these actually people we are going to listen to in assessing the situation and planning our actions?
America used to be a country characterized by people of common sense.
"Fool me twice, shame on me." It's deja vu all over again.
We need a fully funded withdrawal from Congress. Let's see if they can at least get that right.
America: 14 Characteristics Of Fascism.
It's nice to hear Mike Malloy is still out there doing his ranting and raving. The fascists will never shut him up.
First Place
The People of America, not the WarMoney lobby, have to take back our government into our own hands for our sake and the sake of our children.
"Take" is the operative word, because the WarMoneyMedia lobby has control of America--the American mind--and they will not relinquish it. This Iraq misadventure is just another way of the WarMoneyMedia lobby holding the American people hostage.
It's blackmail.
Monday, September 10, 2007
Democracy and Media
read more | digg story
Forever The Victims
read more | digg story
Friday, September 7, 2007
poor america
The dollar fell sharply following the report and as the likelihood of an interest rate cut appeared to increase. Dollar-based assets would earn less interest if the Fed were to cut rates. In addition, gold prices rose sharply because some investors would be expected to abandon a weakening dollar and move into gold if the central bank cuts rates.
Thursday, September 6, 2007
Experts Doubt Drop In Violence in Iraq
read more | digg story
Mr. President...Why the Big Smile?
read more | digg story
Airborne Nukes
That's the offical story.
Lieutenant Colonel Ed Thomas of the Air Force pooh-poohed the concern over the "mistaken transport:"
“Air Force standards are very exacting when it comes to munitions handling,” he said. “The weapons were always in our custody and there was never a danger to the American public.”
Former intelligence officer Larry Johnson, blogging at TPM Cafe, had this to say, however,
Barksdale Air Force Base is being used as a jumping off point for Middle East operations. Gee, why would we want cruise missile nukes at Barksdale Air Force Base. Can’t imagine we would need to use them in Iraq. Why would we want to preposition nuclear weapons at a base conducting Middle East operations?
His final point was to observe that someone on the inside obviously leaked the info that the planes were carrying nukes. A B-52 landing at Barksdale is a non-event. A B-52 landing with nukes. That is something else.
Now maybe there is an innocent explanation for this? I can’t think of one. What is certain is that the pilots of this plane did not just make a last minute decision to strap on some nukes and take them for a joy ride. We need some tough questions and clear answers. What the hell is going on? Did someone at Barksdale try to indirectly warn the American people that the Bush Administration is staging nukes for Iran? I don’t know, but it is a question worth asking.
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
Depleted Uranium Weapons Turning Iraq Into Nuclear Nightmare
read more | digg story
Germany foils 'massive' bomb plot
read more | digg story
Tuesday, September 4, 2007
Conscience of a Conservative
And, from Glenn Greenwald,
It is critical to emphasize that Goldsmith -- like James Comey and John Ashcroft -- is no hero. He is a hard-core right-wing ideologue who continues to support many of the administration's most radical positions, including his view that Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions does not apply to terrorist suspects (the position rejected by Hamdan). And it was Goldsmith who ultimately approved of the modified (and plainly illegal) NSA warrantless eavesdropping program.
Moreover, Goldsmith explains that he had not even intended to address the NSA surveillance program in his book, but changed his mind once he was served with subpoenas by the FBI in connection with the ongoing criminal investigation to find out who the whistleblower was who alerted the country to this illegality -- an investigation which Goldsmith supports. As Goldsmith says: "I'm not a civil libertarian, and what I did wasn't driven by concerns about civil liberties per se."
Goldsmith is commendable only by comparison to the truly extremist and reprehensible likes of Cheney, Addington, Gonzales and Yoo. He is, by and large, a True Believer in the Bush "War on Terror" and in theories designed to expand substantially executive power. That is what makes his revelations all the more credible, and all the more disturbing. What he is describing is a band of deranged and lawless radicals who, during his tenure, ran our government and who, after they forced him out, continue to do so.
read more | digg story
Hillary Rolls On: Are Netroots a Paper Tiger?
read more | digg story
Friday, August 31, 2007
Memo to Charlie Rangel
The Congress has already authorized far more money for war than the most exhorbitant estimates by any expert prior to the invasion and occupation of Iraq. The "cost overrun" of the Iraqi occupation disqualifies the Bush administration from any further credibility or allocations by the American people.
Additionally, it is widely believed that President Bush is seeking an opportunity to effectuate "regime change" in Tehran. The United States is already viewed by our former friends as an aggressive, rogue state. If we proceed to unilaterally attack Iran, causing infrastructure damage and civilian casualties, for whatever ostensible reason, we will further drive a wedge between the American people and the good will of Europeans, Asians, Africans and South Americans.
Finally, military spending has increased drastically under the Bush administration, and domestic programs, as well as traditional diplomatic programs, have received less support from the government and the media. This is a dangerous imbalance that I'm sure you agree needs to be rectified. We must reduce military spending in the long term in order to focus as a country on rejuvenating our society for the future, and building alliances for global cooperation.
Therefore, please use your power and any means at your disposal to impede the appropriation of any additional funds for military operations on behalf of the Bush Administration.
Please work to reduce overall military spending and military conflict as soon as possible.
Thank you for all your hard work.
Sincerely,
AC-130 (Long Version)
As horrific as war is, this Army film of "precision" air attacks on Afghan insurgents raises the nightmare to an even more chilling level. Helpless "personnel" in a tiny, plain "insurgent compound" are eradicated like ants by firebombs. The bombs descend from a US plane, precision targeting the fragile, mortal shapes below as they helplessly flee for their lives from the flying menace.
This film demonstrates how our armed forces have brought the dehumanization of mass killing and destruction to unimaginable efficiency.
No peace will come of this.
Thursday, August 30, 2007
The rot in the White House
read more | digg story
A Rigged Report on U.S. Voting?
read more | digg story
End Nigh for Muni Wi-Fi?
read more | digg story
Dubya Discovers Poverty Data
Furthermore, let's not forget the simple fact that the poverty rate isn't measured on the basis of individual income per se, but on household income. So, a decrease in the poverty rate may simply indicate that more people in every family have to work, or work more.
read more | digg story
Wednesday, August 29, 2007
Study: US preparing 'massive' military attack against Iran
read more | digg story
Tuesday, August 28, 2007
Who Owns the Media and How the People Can Take It Back
read more | digg story
Conyers's Excuses
It's fear. They're all afraid of being gang-tackled by the Republicans and the media. They're afraid the motion would go nowhere and they would be ruined.
Perhaps. But isn't it worth the risk? It could save the country.
So now we arrive at the real "balance of power." Power belongs to those who can balance the Constitution and a calculator for popular support!
Saturday, August 25, 2007
The Third Rail War
read more | digg story
Corruption
This article explains what the Iraq war is really about: enrichment of Bush's corporate allies at the expense of the US taxpayer, the Iraqi people, and the next 10 generations.
A Saturday at the end of August, when Congress and everybody else is on vacation: will the corporate media pick the story up?
Friday, August 24, 2007
The Price of Oil
read more | digg story
Thursday, August 23, 2007
Stuck With Warfare State
read more | digg story
American Fascism
The (new) reason we're fighting: to prevent an Iraqi bloodbath.
In the Los Angeles Times today, Julian E. Barnes writes in Sadr's Army Proves Hard to Beat:
In the east Baghdad strongholds of the Al Mahdi militia, U.S. efforts to weaken ties between the militant Shiite Muslim group and the Shiite population are falling short, say American soldiers assigned to carry out the plan.
In Dangerous Delusions, author Leon Hadar contrasts the reality we live in with the fantasy world inhabited by the neocons, Bush, and the portion of the American people they routinely brainwash.
In their alternate reality, the ouster of Saddam Hussein was part of the war on the terrorists who perpetrated the 9/11 attacks. In the real world, Saddam Hussein had no ties to al-Qaeda, whose leaders and members are now hiding in Pakistan (which in the Neocon World is an ally of the United States in the war against al-Qaeda). In the Neocon World, there were WMDs in Iraq. In the real world, such Iraqi WMDs do not exist. In the Neocon World, the United States has liberated Iraq. In the real world, U.S. troops are facing a powerful insurgency, and most Iraqis want them out. In the Neocon World, the United States has turned Mesopotamia into a model of political and economic freedom. In the real world, Iraq is ruled by a Shi'ite government committed to narrow ethnic interests and religious values, its economy is ruined, and it is disintegrating into a bloody civil war. In the Neocon World, the United States is now spreading democracy in the Middle East. In the real world, the United States is providing huge arms packages to help strengthen the power of the theocracy of Saudi Arabia and the military regime of Egypt. In the Neocon World, the Iraq War is strengthening the position of the United States and its allies in the Middle East. In the real world, the Iraq War strengthened the hands of anti-American Iran and its allies in the Middle East, including Hezbollah and Hamas.
Yes, fascism is and has always been the politics of illusion |
Wednesday, August 22, 2007
Consent of the Governed?
But, if you have to start covering your tracks from Congress and the American people, from Inspectors General and subpoenas and lawsuits, and the only way you can keep the evidence of wrongdoing buried is to hide it, bury it, or destroy it, then you're really pleading guilty to all the crimes the people are accusing you of--whether the media publicize it or not.
Take the case of the 5 million missing emails, for example. They have proven to be important as evidence in numerous investigations, including Congressional corruption probes involving the Abramoff syndicate, the outing of a CIA undercover agent, and the firing of the US Attorneys.
The White House has said it is aware that some e-mails may not have been automatically archived on a computer server for the Executive Office of the President.
The e-mails, the White House has said, may have been preserved on backup tapes.
``The Office of Administration is looking into whether there are e-mails not automatically archived; and once we determine whether or not there is a problem, we'll take the necessary steps to address it,'' said White House spokesman Scott Stanzel.
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
No leading candidates want to cut Defense
read more | digg story
Monday, August 20, 2007
Bob Schieffer Remarks about Petraeus Report
This guy sounds pretty good for a corporate media pundit. I suppose humans have consciences after all, whether they choose to listen to them or not.
Friday, August 17, 2007
Thursday, August 16, 2007
Jail them Now
My attitude is,
There's already been enough evidence of improprieties by Gonzales, the White House, the NSA, the telecoms, and anybody else who was involved in this sordid history-- even insofar as they just gave (or withheld ) testimony.
This is a brilliant piece of inductive reasoning, but aren't we well past the point of trying to figure out if somebody committed a crime, perjury, or just deceived somebody else in the Administration, or the public, for that matter?
Anybody in Congress who doesn't act to throw these sleazebags in jail is complicit and should likewise be tried for treason, before 2008.
Tuesday, August 14, 2007
Monday, August 13, 2007
Lying About Lying America Into War
This is a video posted by David Sirota featuring Don Rumsfeld lying about how he and BushCo lied us into the Iraq occupation.
Friday, August 10, 2007
Fascist Propagandists, Mainstream Media
Another view of the press conference appeared in Froomkin's comments in the Washington Post:
When it came to Iraq, Bush said at least one thing that was untrue, and one thing that was only too true. "In the July 15th report that I submitted to Congress, there were indications that they had met about half the benchmarks and some of the political benchmarks they were falling short," he said. The White House's own report found "progress" in only eight of 18 benchmarks -- not that the benchmarks had been met. And even that assessment is highly debatable.
So, where was Matthews coming from?
It should be obvious to every American with a brain that CNN--particularly Chris Matthews, Fox--particularly Shawn Hannity, Alan Colmes, Bill O'Reilly and "guests" like Robert Novak, Charles Krauthammer and Bill Kristol and paid Pentagon propagandist operatives.
None of these people, nor any of the Administration officials they are ostensibly paid to monitor and inform the public about, have a shred of credibility.
But they do have the floor.
What they say to millions of Americans cannot be disputed on the airwaves (although it can on the internet and the blogs, so far), thanks to the Clintons and the big money monopolies in the telecommunications industry.
Not only is it propaganda, it's censorship. Not only are they telling us what to think, but they are squelching any dissent.
"Why?" we used to ask, because we couldn't see the elephant in the room.
"Why don't they want us to know the truth?"
"Why do they have to control all the broadcasting and propagate an incessant daily deluge of pro-big money, pro military, pro-corporate verbiage?"
"Isn't the truth--whatever its content--good enough?"
No.
The truth would open the floodgates of public outrage at pro-business, anti-citizen financial, industrial, trade, environmental, education, and immigration policies.
The truth would cause a surge in public outrage that would sweep most incumbent Congressmen and Senators out of office in the next election--if not sooner.
The truth would reveal payoffs and massive funding shifts from taxpayers' interests to Pentagon interests. The puppetmasters in the Office of Naval Intelligence, the Office of Net Assessment, and other Pentagon think tanks and policy kitchens would be unmasked, in all their fascist, Orwellian, inhumane and uncivilized hideousness.
Thus, George Bush's press conferences, Chris Matthews's soliloquies of praise, Hillary Clinton's defense of lobbyists, Bill Kristol's urge for the surge, etc...
It may already be too late.
We the people have to take back the country now.
Anyone familiar with history knows what will happen otherwise. And we don't want to go there.
Saturday, August 4, 2007
BushCo Arms Deal
By Derrick Jackson, Globe Columnist | August 1, 2007
SECRETARY OF STATE Condoleezza Rice said the United States wants to send $63 billion in military aid and weapons to the Middle East to "bolster forces of moderation and support a broader strategy to counter the negative influences of Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Syria, and Iran."
Talk about wriggling in quicksand. Having destroyed Iraq to save us from horrors that did not exist, Rice now wants to save us from Iran's future nukes by selling American weapons of mass destruction. Over the next decade, the Bush administration wants to give Israel $30 billion in military aid, a nearly 43 percent increase over what that nation received over the last 10 years, according to The New York Times. We want to give $20 billion to Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. We want to give Egypt $13 billion.
Do you feel safe?
"This is throwing bad money after worse money," said Frida Berrigan, senior program associate at the Arms and Security Project of the New America Foundation. The program was formerly known as the Arms Trade Resource Center at the World Policy Institute. "You can see the whole arms package as a buyoff of Arab nations for what we've done in Iraq.
"Justifying the sales because these countries feel threatened by Iran doesn't hold water. Iran is five to 10 years away from a nuclear weapon. That gives the United States and its partners more than enough time to come up with diplomatic solutions," Berrigan said. "This is just going to reinforce Iran's desire to have a nuclear weapon."
The United States had already set records for global arms sales. The New York Times reported in November that the Bush administration and American military contractors doubled arms sales from $10.6 billion to $21 billion from September 2005 to September 2006. Berrigan estimates that the latest proposal will increase military aid and weaponry by another 25 percent.
This is a bipartisan craziness that never ended despite the end of the Cold War. Under the dual guise of national security and protecting American jobs, the first President Bush and President Clinton aggressively promoted US arms sales to more than twice their level of the last years of the Cold War.
Lawrence Korb, assistant defense secretary under President Reagan, told the Globe in 1996, "The brakes are off the system. . . . There is no coherent policy on the transfer of arms. It has become a money game; an absurd spiral in which we export arms only to have to develop more sophisticated ones to counter those spread out all over the world. . . . It is a frightening trend that undermines our moral authority in the New World Order."
The absurd spiral did nothing for regional stability, democracy or stop terrorism from spreading to American shores. Saudi Arabia was a big buyer under Clinton. It remained a "problematic ally," according to the 9/11 commission. This week, the US envoy to the United Nations, Zalmay Khalilzad, could not decide whether Saudi Arabia was "a great ally" or "undermining" the United States in Iraq.
There is no hint of a coherent policy. Under the president, 80 percent of nations that received arms from America in 2003 were classified by the State Department as being either undemocratic or having a poor human rights record, which covers all the Arab countries in the new deal. Israel is a democracy, but in its 2006 country profile, the State Department cites a source that determined that 322 of 660 Palestinians killed by the Israeli military "were not engaged in hostilities when killed and 141 were minors."
This latest deal is so over the top that Israel is not opposing the $33 billion to Arab states because it gets $30 billion to maintain its military edge. En route to the Middle East this week, Rice denied that the military package was an attempt to buy allies with bombs. She also denied that the United States was relaxing its standards for democracy and human rights.
But a report by the Economist Intelligence Unit said that "the weak response in the Middle East to pressures for democratization, as well as the experience with imported political change in Iraq, is making a mockery of George Bush's 'freedom' agenda." Reuters this week quoted Paul Salem, director of the Middle East Center at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, as saying that the arms deal meant Bush's effort to spread democracy in the region was "more than dead."
Berrigan said, "We've created a black hole in what used to be a country and this is supposed to be the solution? More military aid and more high-tech weaponry? The best case scenario is that Congress exercises its power and keeps this from happening."
Derrick Z. Jackson's e-mail address is jackson@globe.com.
© Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company
Sanders, Reid, Nussle
Thank you for your hard work and courageous, strong leadership on behalf of the American people over the last 3-1/2 years.
I shudder to think where we might be--especially concerning civil liberties, environmental protection, education and health care, were it not for your consistent support for the values and priorities of working Americans.
Now, Senator Sanders is attempting to force a delay in the Senate confirmation hearing of Mr. Nussle.
Please support the block, as Nussle is another radical, elitist, pro-special interest Bush crony. Haven't the American people had to suffer enough already from the misrule, misjudgment and greed of this class of tyrants?
I know you understand that Americans want to work hard to make our country a better place for us all. Don't allow the Bush Administration to bully the Senate into handing all the rights, privileges, and wealth of our country over to a handful of oligarchs, further disenfranching an already displaced and disempowered electorate.
Thank you.
I trust you to lead us out of the wilderness of debt and the forest of misplaced priorites where the Bush Administration has left us and posterity to wander without a clear vision of the way forward to peace and prosperity for all.
Sunday, July 29, 2007
Watch out, America!
Animus, ignorance, and magical thinking are a tragic mix and, I'm afraid, that vintage of mind is the hideous wine of our times. The social criteria that gives rise to fascism is in place in the U.S. and those in positions of power have a strong interest in seeing things remain that way. All we can do is what folks (a minority) have always done . . . exile or resistance
Saturday, July 28, 2007
Get it, USA?
Referring to a set of responses to questions regarding the willingness to meet with foreign atagonistic leaders, Matthews and some blackshirt at the Weekly Standard concluded (of course) that Obama was too far left because he is not an empire isolationist.
In other words, he's not the Pentagon's boy, like Matthews, everybody at the Weekly Standard, and the rest of the corporate right wing media.
The fascists are still in the closet, but its hard to hide behind comments like, "That's why Hillary will win this thing," by propaganda outlets like Chris Matthews.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/index.html
And what of polling data that shows exactly the opposite? Who cares? Beltway wisdom is more representative of what Americans believe than what Americans actually believe. From the latest Rasmussen Reports poll:
Forty-two percent (42%) of Americans say that the next President should meet with the heads of nations such as Iran, Syria, and North Korea without setting any preconditions. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 34% disagree while 24% are not sure.
That question came up during last Monday's Presidential Debate with Illinois Senator Barack Obama saying he would commit to such meetings and New York Senator Hillary Clinton offering a more cautious response. Democrats, by a 55% to 22% margin, agree with Obama.
This is precisely the same process that causes one to hear endlessly from Beltway pundits about how Democrats will be in big, big trouble if they keep up with these investigations because "Americans" sure don't like that, even though polls continuously show that Americans overwhelmingly want Congress to investigate the Bush administration even further. The claim that Congress is "going to far" or "neglecting the people's business" or "engaged in witch-hunts" are actually embraced only by minorities. But that is what the government-defending Beltway media believes; hence, they repeatedly assert as a mantra-like chant, based on nothing, that opposition to more investigations is the "centrist position," that Americans do not like Congressional probes and see them as unjustifiably obstructionist.
It is not difficult to understand why Americans are supportive of Obama's pro-diplomacy instincts. It is because they have seen the alternative for the last six years and know that it is a petulant refusal to speak to the Bad People that is the real fringe, dangerous, extremist position. Indeed, the actual fringe extremism on this issue was vividly illustrated on the same Chris Matthews Show, by the very same Stephen Hayes, the Serious right-wing national security scholar and all-around tough guy:
Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Monday, July 16, 2007
Thanks, Russ
You are eminently reasonable, sir, and your leadership has been a beacon of truth in a dark era of fear and dishonesty in Washington.
We have to have our priorities straight. There are many, many problems facing the country right now.
Some might even say that the democratic legislatures established by our Constitution are no longer capable of administering the vast oversight and prodigious managerial issues of the United States of America.
If that were true, then we would be better off with a dictator, like Augustus, to "strengthen the body politic" and "unify our political will."
There are many people--especially among those in power now--who would welcome such a solution here. With a dictator in power, the legislature would be free to turn its attention and energy to more manageable, less nettlesome matters.
I don't really believe you are proposing we become a dictatorship, but that is the endpoint of your logic.
Our representatives either stand for us and our sovereignty as the foundation of authority for government, or else they stand for somebody else to hold dominion in the United States of America, either a dictator, an oligarchy, or some other governing force--the military, perhaps.
The point is, Senator, these abuses are being visited on the people not only by and because of the President and Vice President and their Cabinet members, but because the government is not effectively serving the people's interests in national affairs.
Our representatives are always seeking "more practical" solutions than the ones that really go to the heart of the issue: a loss of citizen involvement and empowerment.
If you think you can accomplish anything progressive with BushCo in office, I suggest you are trying to blunt the rightful aim by the body politic to recover its authority from those who seek to prevent us from governing ourselves.
You really don't have the right not to impeach, either, because you are sworn to defend our Constitution. It is now in danger. There is no "other business" for Senators in a democracy. That's really an excuse for accommodating a dictator and sacrificing the right of the people to govern ourselves.